Skip to content
Hitman Marketing
Contracts

The board · Hearing aids

The Clearwater hearing aids contract, and the four points that never move

The Clearwater hearing aids contract runs ninety days against Countryside Hearing Aid Services, a Florida corporation filed in June 2011 and reading ACTIVE. A funded survey read the local pack at twenty-five points across the city on fifteen searches; the firm took a top-three place at exactly four of those points on every one of them, and led none.

Hearing aids — the mark

Countryside Hearing Aid Services

Clearwater

Takes a top-three place at four of twenty-five map points on every one of the fifteen searches, and leads none of them.

Open

Every reading on this page came from a public source that anyone can check. Each one names the register or platform it was read from, and the date it was read, in the list at the bottom.

The searches this contract tracks, and where they stand

The contract fixes fifteen searches in writing before any work starts — the ones somebody in Clearwater actually types when they need hearing aids. We read the local pack for each of them at twenty-five points spread across the city. On every one of the fifteen, some other business takes a top-three place across more of those points than Countryside Hearing Aid Services does, so there is no table of held searches below — that is the reading, not a gap in it. Where they stand across the grid as a whole is in the record further down.

0 of the fifteen, read on August 2, 2026. A search would count here when no other business takes a top-three place across more of its twenty-five points, and none of the fifteen meets that bar. A reading on one day is a snapshot, not a trend, and nothing here claims a place holds tomorrow.

Who they are, on the record

Every line here is a filing the company made itself, read from the state’s own register rather than from a search result. Each read is dated in the source list at the bottom of this page. It is here because a contract names a company, and a company is whatever the register says it is.

Register

Countryside Hearing Aid Services

Name on the register
COUNTRYSIDE HEARING AID SERVICES, INC., a Florida profit corporation
Document number
P11000054696
Date filed
10 June 2011
Status on the detail record
ACTIVE
Officers named on the record
Two, both natural persons
Registered agent
One of those two officers, at the store address
Owning company named on the record
None
Name on the record until 15 June 2015
Mitchell Hearing Consultants, Inc.
Events on the record
One — that name change, and nothing else
Separate registrations of the trading name
None — the trading name is the corporate name
Years from that filing
15

Read from the register’s own detail pages, not from a search result. A found record is not an active record, and a status in a results list is not a status.

Why we are willing to name them

Naming a real company in public is a decision, not a flourish. Three things have to be true before a business appears on this board, and each one is a reading rather than an opinion. A business that fails any of them is not named, and the trade ships without a target — which has happened.

  1. Nobody bigger is standing behind them

    The corporation names two officers on its own detail record, both of them natural persons at the store address, and one of the two is also the registered agent rather than a corporate agent service. No parent, no holding company, no member entity and no corporate officer appears anywhere on the filing, and its complete event history is a single name change in 2015 — no merger and no conversion. Read from the register's own detail record on 3 August 2026.

  2. The corporation is live today, on the state's own record

    The detail record reads Status ACTIVE, filed 10 June 2011. That status came off the register's own detail page rather than a column in a results list, because a status printed in a list is not a status. The separate register of trading names was also read as an alphabetical window, row by row: no registration carries this name, because the name the business trades under is the corporate name itself.

  3. Two separate instruments, and three addresses, agree

    The map grid and the assistant readings were collected on 2 and 3 August 2026 by two independent instruments and place this business in the same band of the same market. The fifteen searches were read twenty-five times each on the map side and three times each on the answer side. The address the corporation gives the register, the address printed on the state licensing record we read but do not publish, and the one address the business shows on its own site are the same street number.

What their reviews say, and what they do not

Countryside Hearing Aid Services shows 80 reviews at 4.8 on Google, read from the profile itself by the funded survey. Read on 3 August 2026 from the business profile the survey resolved by place ID, to a depth of two hundred — the profile itself, not a directory's copy of one. It is a lifetime total on a single platform and it is not a sum across platforms; different platforms count different people and no arithmetic joins them. It replaces a rating this row carried until 3 August 2026, which a directory had copied from this same platform rather than read.

Every review figure on this site names the platform it came from, and every one of them was read from that platform rather than from a search result about it. Where a count is missing, it is missing because we could not read one we were willing to put a name to — not because there is nothing there.

What we are not claiming

Research turns up things that do not survive a second look, and things that are true but not ours to publish. Both are listed here, because a page that prints only the flattering half of its own evidence is a sales page, and this is supposed to be a record.

How quickly those reviews arrived, or how often the business replies to them.
The same read that produced the count produced both of those figures, and neither is published. A count is a position — the size of a reputation already built, which the business knows better than we do. How fast it is growing and how it is handled are operating facts about a company we are not working for, and this board does not print those about anybody. A rating this row carried until 3 August 2026 is also gone: a directory had copied it rather than read it, and it is withdrawn rather than restated.
The state licence, its number, its status or its expiry date.
This is a refusal of something we hold rather than something we lack, and it is the most deliberate one on this page. The licence exists, it was read on the state's own verification screen on 3 August 2026, and every figure this board published about it turned out to be correct. It is refused because it belongs to a person and not to the company: the state issues it to a named individual, and a business-name search of the same register returns no record at all. A commercial page written against a business may not carry a private individual's professional credential as part of the argument, and for the same reason the address of that screen is not in the source list below — a citation a reader can click is a publication. Nothing is implied by the refusal in either direction.
That this business is older than its corporation.
Fifteen years is what a filing supports. A tenure figure on this board is the earliest Florida registration in a chain of entities linked by filings — not by a name, and not by a shared address. This corporation was filed on 10 June 2011 and traded under a different name until 2015, which is one continuous company and is why the figure is fifteen rather than eleven. An older company did once use this name at this address, and no filing on either record connects the two: there is no merger, no purchase and no succession, so there is no chain to walk and we reach no further back.
An ownership census of the businesses on this grid.
Twelve dossiers on this board publish one: who owns the domains competing for a trade's searches, sorted into directories, franchise brands, private-equity groups and independents. That census is a reading over a list of web results. This trade's fifteen were read on a map grid instead, which returns businesses and classifies nobody's owner, so there is no such reading to publish. Sixty-two businesses take a top-three place somewhere on this grid and we know who owns none of them. Printing three zeros beside one large unclassified count would state three findings nobody made.
How long this company's assets have been visible.
Twelve dossiers here carry a web-archive first-capture date. No archive reading was taken for this business, so there is none on this page and none is inferred from its absence. The register date beside it is a different observation and is not a substitute: when a company was incorporated and when anything became visible are two separate questions.
Anything at all about how their website is built or served.
This survey record carries no reading of that kind — the fields that would hold one are empty, so nothing was measured about their pages, their markup or what any crawler is allowed to do. An earlier pass on this board did record observations of that sort about this business. They were taken on a different day by a different method, they were not repeated here, and a page dated to this reading does not get to borrow them.
That the fifteen searches were read more than once.
They were read once, on 2 August 2026 — twenty-five grid points each on the map side, and the answer side three runs each the following day. That is depth within a single collection rather than a second collection. Nothing here says a place moved, held, or is where they usually sit.
That every surface behind the answer readings was read.
The instrument now grades five assistant surfaces; this record was read under the four it named at the time. Three of those four returned readings and the fourth, hand-run, carries none — so the answer side holds three of the five surfaces the instrument now grades. It is stated here because a short reading must not pass as a complete one, and because a reader is entitled to know the shape of the instrument before the number.

How the Clearwater hearing aids contract is measured, and on what instrument

Fifteen searches are named in the agreement before any work starts. Each was read in the Google local pack at twenty-five points spread across Clearwater on 2 August 2026, and separately put to three AI assistants three times each the next day. Both readings are counts of cells, not ranks.

A grid point is a place on the map, not a person. Reading the local pack from twenty-five points across one city is how you tell a business that holds the pack across Clearwater from one that holds it on the block its shop sits on. From a single reading the two look identical, and over ninety days they behave nothing alike. This trade is the clearest example of the difference the board has.

The two axes stay separate because they are separate instruments. Three hundred and seventy-five map readings were accepted for this trade and one hundred and thirty-five answer readings across three assistant surfaces at three runs each. Neither is converted into the other. Neither is compared with the organic search ladder seven other trades on this board were read on either — same fifteen strings, different rulers, and putting the two numbers side by side would show a reader a movement nobody measured.

That last point is not abstract here. This row published a figure of nine of fifteen until 2 August 2026, taken from a list of web results. The figure on this page is zero of fifteen, taken from a map grid. Nothing fell. They are answers to two different questions, and the older one is not restated anywhere on this page for exactly that reason.

Four points of twenty-five, on every search, whatever is typed

Across all fifteen searches this business took a top-three place at exactly four of the twenty-five grid points — never three, never five. On each of the fifteen at least one other business took more, so it leads none of them outright, and its pooled share of the grid is sixteen per cent.

The invariance is the finding. Four is not an average across the fifteen; it is the number on every single one, from the plainest search anybody types to the long questions people put to an assistant. A business whose presence changes with the wording is competing on what it says. A business whose presence does not change at all is competing on where it is, and the same four points of the city return it no matter what is asked.

That tells a buyer something the pooled percentage hides. The twenty-one grid points that do not return this business do not return it on any search, so there is no wording that reaches them today. The four that do return it return it on everything. This is a footprint, and the contract is a question about whether a footprint can be widened.

Across the whole grid the business takes sixteen per cent of three hundred and seventy-five readings, fifth in a field of sixty-two. The strongest single showing by anybody on any one search is eight points of twenty-five — under a third of the city — so this is a market where nobody holds the map, rather than one with a locked leader at the top. The gap to close on any individual search is between two and four grid points.

What the Florida register says about the company, and what it does not

Countryside Hearing Aid Services, Inc. is Florida document P11000054696, filed 10 June 2011 and reading ACTIVE. Two natural persons are named on it and no company. It was incorporated under a different name and took this one by amendment in June 2015, which the register records as its only event.

A name change is not a new company, and the fifteen years on this page belong to the corporation rather than to the name. The record shows one event in its whole history — that 2015 amendment — and no merger, no conversion, no parent and no holding company anywhere on the filing. That is what the fair-fight gate turns on here, and it turns on a positive reading: a filing that names two individuals, not our having failed to find a company.

The alphabetical window of the separate trading-name register was read row by row rather than at its first line, and there is no registration under this name at all. That is the correct outcome rather than a missing one: the name over the door is the corporate name, so there is no second registration and no second owner behind it.

One thing the register does not settle is age, and the site claims more of it than the filings support. An older company did trade under this name at this address and was dissolved years ago, with different people on it, and no filing on either record connects the two. Where there is no chain of filings there is no chain, so the date this page publishes is 2011 and it reaches past it in neither direction.

Where each of these came from

Every register and platform read for this page, with the date it was read. Follow any of them and you will land where we landed.

  1. Florida Division of Corporations — Corporate detail record and event history

    search.sunbiz.org · read August 3, 2026

  2. Florida Division of Corporations — Register of trading names, read as an alphabetical window

    dos.sunbiz.org · read August 3, 2026

  3. Countryside Hearing Aid Services — Company homepage

    countrysidehearingaids.com · read August 3, 2026

  4. Google — Business profile and reviews, resolved by place ID

    google.com · read August 3, 2026

What this contract costs, and why this number

The hearing aids contract is $10,100 for ninety days against Countryside Hearing Aid Services. Half is due on execution and half only if you finish ahead of them. The figure is measured rather than quoted: we survey this market across the AI assistants and the Google local pack, and the number tracks how much of both the strongest firm here already holds. It is an absolute reading rather than a place in a queue, so it does not move when another trade joins the board, and it is not pulled from a rate card.

How the result is measured, in full →Every published price →

Common questions

Why does the hearing aids contract name Countryside Hearing Aid Services?
Because the survey measures this market and this is the business it returns. A funded reading of the local pack at twenty-five points across the city, on all fifteen contract searches, plus a separate reading of what three AI assistants answer, puts them highest in this market on their weaker of the two axes — which is the test the board applies, because a target has to be hard to beat on the side where they are softest. Three gates cleared first, each on a positive reading rather than an absence.
If they do not lead any of the fifteen searches, why are they the target?
Because leading a search and being hard to displace are different things, and the contract is graded on the second. The board picks the business that stands highest on its weaker axis, and on the assistant side this one is second in a field of a hundred and eighty-one name forms. On the map it holds a stable four points of twenty-five on every search — a position that has not been dislodged by any single wording. The zero above is honest and it is not the whole reading.
Why is there no licence number on this page?
Because the licence belongs to a person rather than to the company. We read it on the state's own verification screen and every figure this board previously published about it was correct, so this is not a doubt about the facts. It is a decision that a page written against a business does not carry a private individual's professional credential as part of its argument. The company itself holds no licence of its own; a search of the same register under the business name returns nothing.

Find out whether your territory is open

One contract per trade in Clearwater. If yours is open you can execute at the published price today; if a competitor already holds it, it is held until their ninety days are up.

See open contractsRequest a territory

The survey is credited in full against the contract if your territory opens and you take it.