Skip to content
Hitman Marketing
Contracts

The board · Pest control

The Clearwater pest control contract, and the firm the grid returns

The Clearwater pest control contract runs ninety days against Nextgen Pest Solutions, a Florida corporation filed on 1 August 2016 and reading ACTIVE from a Gulf to Bay Boulevard address. A funded survey read the local pack at twenty-five points across the city on fifteen searches; on six of them no other business takes more.

Pest control — the mark

Nextgen Pest Solutions

Clearwater

Takes six of twenty-five grid points on fourteen of the fifteen searches, and on six of them nobody takes more.

Open

Every reading on this page came from a public source that anyone can check. Each one names the register or platform it was read from, and the date it was read, in the list at the bottom.

One more reading belongs above the price rather than under it. The research behind this board carries a standing verdict of at-riskon this trade: when the domains returning on its fifteen searches were classified by owner, the head of the field belonged to private-equity groups, franchises or lead aggregators rather than to independents. The contract’s bar does not move — you beat the named target — but in this trade that is not the same as owning the field, and it belongs on the page with the price.

The searches they hold, and where they come back

The contract fixes fifteen searches in writing before any work starts — the ones somebody in Clearwater actually types when they need pest control. We read the local pack for each of them at twenty-five points spread across the city. This is where Nextgen Pest Solutions takes a top-three place on the ones nobody takes more of, and who takes just as many. A reading says “6 of 25” because it counts map points, not a rank we can see inside Google.

Where Nextgen Pest Solutions returns on the fifteen searches this contract tracks
The searchGrid points they holdWho matches them
pest control Clearwater FL6 of 252 other firms
pest control services near Clearwater FL6 of 252 other firms
termite treatment Clearwater FL6 of 252 other firms
bed bug treatment Clearwater FL6 of 251 other firm
ant extermination Clearwater FL6 of 252 other firms
I need bed bug treatment in Clearwater today — name specific companies.6 of 252 other firms

6 of the fifteen, read on August 2, 2026. A search counts here when no other business takes a top-three place across more of its twenty-five points. That is a lead, and on every row above it is a lead shared rather than a lead held alone — the column on the right says with how many. A reading on one day is a snapshot, not a trend, and nothing here claims a place holds tomorrow.

Who they are, on the record

Every line here is a filing the company made itself, read from the state’s own register rather than from a search result. Each read is dated in the source list at the bottom of this page. It is here because a contract names a company, and a company is whatever the register says it is.

Register

Nextgen Pest Solutions

Name on the register
NEXTGEN PEST SOLUTIONS INC, a Florida profit corporation
Document number
P16000063607
Date filed
1 August 2016
Status on the detail record
ACTIVE
Name history on the record
None
Events filed on the record
None
Officers named on the record
One, a natural person
Owning company named on the record
None — the officer row carries no document number
Registered agent
A commercial agent service — an address for service, not an owner
Annual reports on file
Ten, most recently 10 February 2026
Years from that filing
10

Read from the register’s own detail pages, not from a search result. A found record is not an active record, and a status in a results list is not a status.

Why we are willing to name them

Naming a real company in public is a decision, not a flourish. Three things have to be true before a business appears on this board, and each one is a reading rather than an opinion. A business that fails any of them is not named, and the trade ships without a target — which has happened.

  1. No parent company stands behind them on the filing

    The corporation's officer block prints exactly one row, and that row is a natural person rather than a company, carrying no document number of its own. The firm also holds one other live registration, and both of its owner rows print this same corporation's document number — two arms of one company rather than a parent above it. The registered agent is a commercial agent service, which is an address for the service of legal papers and appears in no owner capacity. Read from the registers' own detail records on 3 August 2026.

  2. The registration is live today, on the state's own record

    The detail record reads Status ACTIVE, and ten consecutive annual reports sit on the filing history running to 10 February 2026 — this year's is already in. The second registration this company holds separately reads ACTIVE with a term running to the end of 2029. Both statuses came off the registers' own detail pages rather than a column in a results list, because a status printed in a list is not a status.

  3. Four independent sources print the same street address

    The corporate register's principal address, a second register's owner row for the other registration this company holds, the structured data on the company's own Clearwater page, and a business bureau's profile all give the same suite on the same boulevard — and the last two carry the same telephone number as each other. Two separate registers on two separate hosts, and two independent web sources. On top of that the map grid and the assistant readings were collected the same week by two independent instruments.

What their reviews say, and what they do not

There is no review figure on this page for Nextgen Pest Solutions, and that is a statement about what we could read rather than about them. The funded survey did read a review profile for this business, resolved by place ID, and the number is not on this page. This company runs four offices in three states, and nothing we read establishes that the count belongs to the Clearwater one rather than to another of them. A count that may be about the wrong building is not a reading about this one, whatever platform it came from. Null here means not attributable; it is not a statement that reviews are few or absent.

Every review figure on this site names the platform it came from, and every one of them was read from that platform rather than from a search result about it. Where a count is missing, it is missing because we could not read one we were willing to put a name to — not because there is nothing there.

What we are not claiming

Research turns up things that do not survive a second look, and things that are true but not ours to publish. Both are listed here, because a page that prints only the flattering half of its own evidence is a sales page, and this is supposed to be a record.

Any review count or rating for this business.
There is one in the survey record and it is not published. This company operates from four addresses in three states, and nothing we read ties that count to the Clearwater office rather than to the others. A number whose subject we cannot pin down does not go under anybody's name. Other pages on this board do publish a review count read the same way and on the same day; this one does not, and the difference is which building the number is about rather than where it came from.
That this business was founded in 2005.
Their own site says so. No Florida filing supports it, and a business bureau's record for the same company gives a different year again — three public sources, three incompatible dates. The only Florida corporation under this name was filed on 1 August 2016, and it carries no name history and no events, so there is no Florida chain to walk. Ten years is what a Florida filing supports and ten is what we publish.
That no earlier registration for this company exists anywhere.
We did not establish that and we are not implying it. This company's officer lives in another state and the business operates there, and that state's own corporate register could not be read at all in this pass — its search returned an error and the service is built entirely in JavaScript. An earlier registration may well exist there and may well be what their founding claim refers to. Not looking successfully is not the same as looking and finding nothing, and this is the thinnest tenure figure on this board for exactly that reason.
Anything about a state licence, in either direction.
Pest control in Florida is licensed by the Department of Agriculture rather than the department that licenses the building trades. Its company search could not be read: one route serves an empty shell with no data in it, and the older route returned the same blank form to four different submissions. A business bureau publishes a licence number and an expiry for this company; that is the bureau's transcription and not the register, and we do not restate a transcription as though we had confirmed it at the authority ourselves. Their licensure is unavailable to us, and this page does not say they hold no licence, because we did not look successfully.
That this is a locally owned Clearwater business.
It is not, and no sentence on this page should be read as saying so. The company operates four offices across three states, its sole officer of record lives in another one, and Clearwater is one market among many that it serves. What the register does establish is narrower and is what the fair-fight test actually asks: no parent company, no franchisor and no investment fund stands behind it on any filing. A large competitor funded by its own trade is not the same thing as one funded by somebody else's capital, and only the second is disqualifying here.
An ownership census of the businesses on this grid.
Eleven dossiers on this board publish one: who owns the domains competing for a trade's searches, sorted into directories, franchise brands, private-equity groups and independents. That census is a reading over a list of web results. This trade's fifteen were read on a map grid instead, which returns businesses and classifies nobody's owner. The census that stood on this page until 3 August 2026 was taken over a search ladder run for a different company, and re-pointing it at this one would have been an invention.
How long this company's assets have been visible.
The web-archive first-capture date that stood on this page until 3 August 2026 belonged to the previous target's domain, and it belongs to that company rather than this one. No archive reading was taken here, so there is none, and none is inferred from its absence. The register date beside it is a different observation and is not a substitute.
That the fifteen searches were read more than once.
They were read once — twenty-five grid points each on the map side on 2 August 2026, and three runs each on the answer side the following day. That is depth within a single collection rather than a second collection. Nothing here says a place moved, held, or is where they usually sit.
That the counts on this page correct for a business appearing under two names.
Barely, and on this trade that is not a technicality. The survey resolves the two axes onto one set of names before counting, but on this trade it could join only a single pair; 115 further name forms matched no single record cleanly and are counted exactly as they were read. A business sitting under two of those forms has its readings split between them. That is precisely how the firm this page named until today came to look absent from a grid it actually sits mid-table on: the form the assistants used for it is still sitting in that unresolved list, and the search vendor files it under a shorter name that was never joined to it. We publish the limitation rather than the tidier arithmetic.
That every surface behind the answer readings was read.
The instrument now grades five assistant surfaces; this record was read under the four it named at the time. Three of those four returned readings and the fourth, hand-run, carries none — so the answer side holds three of the five surfaces the instrument now grades. A short reading must not pass as a complete one, and a reader is entitled to know the shape of the instrument before the number.

How the Clearwater pest control contract is measured

Fifteen searches are named in the agreement before any work starts. Each was read in the Google local pack at twenty-five points spread across Clearwater on 2 August 2026, and separately put to three AI assistants three times each. Both readings count cells on a map, not ranks.

A grid point is a place, not a person. Reading the local pack from twenty-five points across one city is how you tell a business that holds the pack across Clearwater from one that holds it near its own front door. From a single reading the two look the same, and across ninety days they behave nothing alike.

The two axes stay separate because they are separate instruments. Three hundred and seventy-five map readings were accepted for this trade and one hundred and thirty-five answer readings across three assistant surfaces at three runs each. Neither converts into the other, and neither is set beside the organic search ladder that seven other trades on this board were read on — same fifteen strings, different rulers.

This row changed hands on 3 August 2026 because the firm named on it before that date leads none of the fifteen on the instrument the contract names. It is not absent from the market — it sits eighth of sixty-nine businesses across the grid as a whole — but a target that leads no search cannot be beaten on a term about leading searches, and a term nobody can lose is not a term.

What the Clearwater pest control local pack actually looks like

Sixty-nine businesses take a top-three place somewhere on this grid, and no business anywhere on it takes more than seven of any single search's twenty-five points. Nextgen Pest Solutions takes six on fourteen of the fifteen searches, and eighty-seven of three hundred and seventy-five cells overall — third in the market.

This grid has an unusual property worth stating plainly, because the headline number invites the wrong inference. Their count is six on fourteen of the fifteen searches. It does not move. What separates a search they hold from one they miss is not their own number at all — it is whether some other business reached seven. On the nine searches they miss, they are holding exactly as much of Clearwater as on the six they hold.

So six of fifteen is a true statement about the market rather than about their consistency. On six searches nobody beat them; on nine, somebody did, by a single grid point. Across the whole grid they sit third of sixty-nine, behind two firms carrying ninety-eight and eighty-nine cells against their eighty-seven.

On the six they hold they are level with one or two other firms rather than ahead of them, and that is the reading that matters most to a buyer: the bar to clear on those six is a tie, not a lead. Seven of twenty-five is this market's ceiling — no business anywhere on this grid holds more of any single search than that.

How old Nextgen Pest Solutions is, and what the register does not settle

Nextgen Pest Solutions Inc is a Florida corporation, document P16000063607, filed on 1 August 2016 and reading ACTIVE. Measured from that filing the business is ten years old. Their own site claims an earlier founding, and no Florida filing supports it.

The Florida record is clean and short. One officer, a natural person; no name history; no events; no owning company on any row; and ten consecutive annual reports, the most recent filed in February this year. That is what the fair-fight test turns on here, and it turns on a positive reading — a filing naming an individual and no corporation — rather than on our having found no parent.

This is the one tenure figure in this group that we publish with a caveat attached rather than a flourish. Ten years is what a Florida filing supports. The company says it was founded eleven years before that, and a business bureau's file gives a third year again. We could not read the corporate register of the state this company's officer lives in, and an earlier registration may sit there. So the figure above is what Florida records, stated as exactly that, and nothing on this page says there is nothing else to find.

One thing the register does settle, and it cuts against the flattering reading: this is not a local independent. The company works from four addresses across three states and Clearwater is one market among many that it serves. That is a large competitor rather than an outspent one, which is a different thing from a firm with somebody else's money behind it — and it is only the second that would have kept them off this board.

Where each of these came from

Every register and platform read for this page, with the date it was read. Follow any of them and you will land where we landed.

  1. Florida Division of Corporations — Entity detail record

    search.sunbiz.org · read August 3, 2026

  2. Florida Division of Corporations — Fictitious-name register, read as an alphabetical window

    dos.sunbiz.org · read August 3, 2026

  3. Nextgen Pest Solutions — Company homepage

    ngpest.com · read August 3, 2026

What this contract costs, and why this number

The pest control contract is $9,500 for ninety days against Nextgen Pest Solutions. Half is due on execution and half only if you finish ahead of them. The figure is measured rather than quoted: we survey this market across the AI assistants and the Google local pack, and the number tracks how much of both the strongest firm here already holds. It is an absolute reading rather than a place in a queue, so it does not move when another trade joins the board, and it is not pulled from a rate card.

How the result is measured, in full →Every published price →

Common questions

Why does the pest control contract name Nextgen Pest Solutions?
Because the survey measures this market and this is the business it returns. A funded reading of the local pack at twenty-five points across the city, on all fifteen contract searches, puts them third on the grid overall and level or better with everybody on six of the fifteen. Three tests cleared first, each on a positive reading rather than an absence: a filing naming one individual and no parent company, a live status with ten annual reports behind it, and four independent sources printing the same street address.
Is this a Clearwater company?
It is registered in Clearwater and has been since 2021 — the state's own record gives a Clearwater address as its principal one, and its licence-free trading name is the corporation's own. It is not, however, a purely local firm: it works from four addresses across three states. We say so because the page would otherwise imply something the record does not support, and because the test this board applies is whether a bigger owner stands behind a business, not whether the business is small.
Why does this page publish no licence for a pest control company?
Because we could not read one at the authority that issues them. Pest control in Florida is licensed by the Department of Agriculture rather than the department covering the building trades, and its company search served an empty shell on one route and a blank form on the other. A business bureau transcribes a number for this company, and a transcription is not a register. We publish licences we read ourselves, and where we could not read one we say that rather than implying there is none.

Find out whether your territory is open

One contract per trade in Clearwater. If yours is open you can execute at the published price today; if a competitor already holds it, it is held until their ninety days are up.

See open contractsRequest a territory

The survey is credited in full against the contract if your territory opens and you take it.