Skip to content
Hitman Marketing
Contracts

The board · Pool construction

The Clearwater pool construction contract, and a grid nobody leads

The Clearwater pool construction contract runs ninety days against Island Way Pools, a Florida trading name whose owning company was filed in April 2007 and reads ACTIVE. A funded survey read the local pack at twenty-five points across the city on fifteen searches; the firm took a top-three place at four of those points on every one.

Pool construction — the mark

Island Way Pools

Clearwater

Third of ninety-eight businesses on the Clearwater grid, and the strongest on none of the fifteen searches.

Open

Every reading on this page came from a public source that anyone can check. Each one names the register or platform it was read from, and the date it was read, in the list at the bottom.

The searches this contract tracks, and where they stand

The contract fixes fifteen searches in writing before any work starts — the ones somebody in Clearwater actually types when they need pool construction. We read the local pack for each of them at twenty-five points spread across the city. On every one of the fifteen, some other business takes a top-three place across more of those points than Island Way Pools does, so there is no table of held searches below — that is the reading, not a gap in it. Where they stand across the grid as a whole is in the record further down.

0 of the fifteen, read on August 3, 2026. A search would count here when no other business takes a top-three place across more of its twenty-five points, and none of the fifteen meets that bar. A reading on one day is a snapshot, not a trend, and nothing here claims a place holds tomorrow.

Who they are, on the record

Every line here is a filing the company made itself, read from the state’s own register rather than from a search result. Each read is dated in the source list at the bottom of this page. It is here because a contract names a company, and a company is whatever the register says it is.

Register

Island Way Pools

Name on the register
ISLANDWAY POOLS, LLC, a Florida fictitious name
Registration number
G22000065368
Date filed
26 May 2022
Status on the detail record
ACTIVE
Registration runs to
31 December 2027
Owner named on the record
One — a company, not a person, with its document number printed
That owning company
ISLAND WAY PAVERS & POOLS, LLC, Florida document L07000038720
Owning company filed
10 April 2007
Owning company status on its detail record
ACTIVE
Authorised persons on the owning company
Exactly one, a natural person, who is also its registered agent
Corporate member or corporate manager on that filing
None
Federal employer number
The same number prints on both records
Annual reports on the owning company
2024, 2025 and 2026, the last of them filed 26 January 2026
Years from that 2007 filing
19

Read from the register’s own detail pages, not from a search result. A found record is not an active record, and a status in a results list is not a status.

Why we are willing to name them

Naming a real company in public is a decision, not a flourish. Three things have to be true before a business appears on this board, and each one is a reading rather than an opinion. A business that fails any of them is not named, and the trade ships without a target — which has happened.

  1. Control ends in one named individual, on the state's own record

    The trading name is a Florida fictitious registration, and on this register such a registration belongs either to a person or to a company. This one belongs to a company: the owner row prints a document number. So the reading was taken one level up, on that company's own detail record, and it names exactly one authorised person — a natural person, who is also the registered agent. No corporate member, no corporate manager, no fund and no franchisor appears anywhere on the filing. Read on 3 August 2026. That is a positive reading of a filing rather than our having found no parent.

  2. Both records are live today, and both statuses came off a detail page

    The trading name reads Status ACTIVE, filed 26 May 2022 and running to 31 December 2027. The company that owns it reads Status ACTIVE, filed 10 April 2007, with annual reports for 2024, 2025 and 2026 and the last of them filed on 26 January 2026. Neither status was read from a column in a results list, and on this register that distinction is not a formality: among the records sharing this trading name is one that prints a live status in the search list and, on its own detail page, reads Rejected Filing.

  3. Three separate readings, and they agree

    The map grid and the assistant readings were collected on 2 and 3 August 2026 by two independent instruments and place this business in the same band of the same market. The fifteen searches were read twenty-five times each on the map side and three times each on the answer side. On the register side the federal employer number prints identically on the trading name's record and on the owning company's, which is what ties the two together, and the street the register prints for that company is the street the business shows on its own site, to the character.

What their reviews say, and what they do not

Island Way Pools shows 167 reviews at 4.7 on Google, read from the profile itself by the funded survey. Read on 3 August 2026 from the business profile the survey resolved by place ID, to a depth of two hundred — the profile itself, not a directory's copy of one. It is a lifetime total on a single platform and it is not a sum across platforms; different platforms count different people and no arithmetic joins them. This row published no review figure of any kind until 3 August 2026, because until the survey ran there was no count anyone here had actually read.

Every review figure on this site names the platform it came from, and every one of them was read from that platform rather than from a search result about it. Where a count is missing, it is missing because we could not read one we were willing to put a name to — not because there is nothing there.

What we are not claiming

Research turns up things that do not survive a second look, and things that are true but not ours to publish. Both are listed here, because a page that prints only the flattering half of its own evidence is a sales page, and this is supposed to be a record.

How quickly those reviews arrived, or how often the business replies to them.
The same read that produced the count produced both of those figures, and neither is published. A count is a position — the size of a reputation already built, which the business knows better than we do. How fast it is growing and how it is handled are operating facts about a company we are not working for, and this board does not print those about anybody.
That this business is older than the filing behind it.
Nineteen years is what a filing supports. A tenure figure on this board is the earliest Florida registration in a chain of entities linked by filings — not by a name, not by a shared surname and not by a shared address. The trading name was registered in 2022 and the company that owns it was filed in April 2007, and those two records are joined by a filing: the owner block on one names the other by document number, and the same federal employer number prints on both. So the count runs from 2007. Their own site states a different and older date; it is not restated here, and the register is what this page publishes.
That any other record carrying this trading name says anything about this business.
Five further Florida records share it. Different document numbers, different federal employer numbers, no successor event and no predecessor event — nothing filed connects any of them forward or back. A shared name is not a filing link, so none is walked as a chain and none is counted in the nineteen. One of the five is also the reason every status on this page came off a detail record: in the search results it prints as live, and its own detail page reads Rejected Filing. A status in a list is not a status.
Anything about a state contractor licence, in either direction.
The state's licensee search would not execute for us. Two attempts returned a page carrying no result set at all, which is an instrument that did not run rather than a register that came back empty — and the difference between those two is the whole reason this refusal is worded as it is. Their licensure is therefore unavailable to us, and unavailable is not a finding. In particular this page does not say they hold no licence. Nor does it publish a number taken from anywhere other than the register itself, including from the business's own pages.
An ownership census of the businesses on this grid.
Twelve dossiers on this board publish one: who owns the domains competing for a trade's searches, sorted into directories, franchise brands, private-equity groups and independents. That census is a reading over a list of web results. This trade's fifteen were read on a map grid instead, which returns businesses and classifies nobody's owner, so there is no such reading to publish. Ninety-eight businesses take a top-three place somewhere on this grid and we know who owns none of them. An earlier version of this page carried such a census; it was taken against a different company on a different instrument, and pointing it at this one would have been invention rather than research.
How long this company's assets have been visible.
Twelve dossiers here carry a web-archive first-capture date. This page used to carry one too, and it was a first capture of a different company's domain. No archive reading was taken for this business, so there is none here and none is inferred from its absence. The register date beside it is a different observation and is not a substitute: when a company was registered and when anything became visible are two separate questions.
Anything at all about how their website is built or served.
This survey record carries no reading of that kind — the fields that would hold one are empty, so nothing was measured about their pages or about what any reader is allowed to fetch. An earlier pass on this board did record observations of that sort, and they were about the company this contract named until 3 August 2026. A page dated to this reading does not get to borrow them, and they were never about this business in the first place.
That the fifteen searches were read more than once.
They were read once — twenty-five grid points each on the map side on 2 August 2026, and the answer side three runs each the following day. That is depth within a single collection rather than a second collection. Nothing here says a place moved, held, or is where they usually sit.
That every surface behind the answer readings was read.
The instrument now grades five assistant surfaces; this record was read under the four it named at the time. Three of those four returned readings and the fourth, hand-run, carries none — so the answer side holds three of the five surfaces the instrument now grades. It is stated here because a short reading must not pass as a complete one, and because a reader is entitled to know the shape of the instrument before the number.
That anything on this page can be compared with what this row published yesterday.
Until 3 August 2026 this contract named a different company, and every figure on this page was a figure about that company: a register chain, a run of web results, an ownership census, an archive date. The board's search reading moved from four of fifteen to zero of fifteen on the same day, and those two numbers are answers to two different questions asked with two different instruments — one counts a domain coming back in a list of web results, the other counts places on a map where a business appears in the local pack. Neither is restated beside the other anywhere on this site, because a reader shown both would see a movement nobody measured.

How the Clearwater pool construction contract is measured, and on what instrument

The agreement fixes fifteen pool builder searches in writing before anything starts. Every one was read in the Google local pack from twenty-five points spread across Clearwater on 2 August 2026, then put separately to three AI assistants, three runs apiece, the following day. Both sides count cells rather than ranks.

A grid point is a place on the map, not a person. Reading the local pack from twenty-five points across one city is how you tell a business that holds the pack across Clearwater from one that holds it on the block its yard sits on. From a single reading the two look identical, and over ninety days they behave nothing alike.

The two axes stay separate because they are separate instruments. Three hundred and seventy-five map readings were accepted for this trade and one hundred and thirty-five answer readings across three assistant surfaces at three runs each. Neither is converted into the other. Neither is compared with the organic search ladder seven other trades on this board were read on either — same fifteen strings, different rulers, and putting the two numbers side by side would show a reader a movement nobody measured.

That distinction is why this row changed hands on 3 August 2026. The contract is graded on beating a named business in the local pack, and the business named on this row before that date holds no cell of this grid at all — nor a single one of the hundred and thirty-five answer readings. A term nobody can lose is not a term, so the board now names the business the grid actually returns.

The same four points of the city, and the same six against them, fifteen times

Two numbers hold across every one of the fifteen searches: this business took a top-three place at four of the twenty-five grid points, and the strongest business on that search took six. Not four on average and six on average — four and six on all fifteen. It leads none, and takes sixteen per cent of the grid overall.

The pair is the finding, and it is rarer than either number by itself. A business whose grid presence moves with the wording is competing on what it publishes; one whose presence does not move at all is competing on where it is. Here neither side of the comparison moves. Fifteen different phrasings — the plainest thing a homeowner types, and the long sentences people put to an assistant — return the same four points of the city to this business and the same six to whoever is strongest on that phrasing.

Six of twenty-five is the market's ceiling rather than this firm's. Nobody on this grid took more than six points of any single search, which is under a quarter of the city even where they are strongest. That is a flat pack rather than a locked one: there is no incumbent holding Clearwater, there is a crowd of ninety-eight businesses each holding a corner of it, and the distance from this position to the top of any single search is two grid points.

Pooled across the whole grid, three hundred and seventy-five accepted readings put this business at sixteen per cent, third of the ninety-eight, behind two at twenty-four and eighteen. The twenty-one points that do not return it do not return it on anything, and the four that do return it return it on everything. That is a footprint rather than a topic, and the contract is a question about whether a footprint can be widened.

What the Florida register says about Island Way Pools, and where the gate was read

The name is a Florida fictitious registration, G22000065368, filed 26 May 2022 and ACTIVE to the end of 2027. Its owner is not a person but a company — Florida document L07000038720, filed 10 April 2007 and ACTIVE — and that company's record names exactly one authorised person, a natural person.

A trading name on this register belongs either to a person or to a company, and which one it is decides where the reading has to be taken. Where the owner row carries no document number, the registration is a sole proprietor's and the record in front of you is the whole answer. Here the owner row prints a document number, so the record in front of you is not the answer: the question of who stands behind the business has simply moved up one level, to the company named on it.

Taken there, it clears on a positive reading. That company's detail record lists a single authorised person, a natural person, and that same individual is also its registered agent rather than a corporate agent service. No corporate member, no corporate manager, no holding company and no fund appears anywhere on the filing. What ties the two records together is not the shared word in their names — it is the owner block naming the company by document number, and the same federal employer number printing on both.

Nineteen years is the figure this page publishes, and it runs from that company's April 2007 filing rather than from the 2022 trading name. Five further Florida records carry the same trading name and none of them is counted: they carry different document numbers and different federal employer numbers, and nothing filed connects any of them forward or back. Where there is no chain of filings there is no chain, and a shared name is not a filing.

Where each of these came from

Every register and platform read for this page, with the date it was read. Follow any of them and you will land where we landed.

  1. Florida Division of Corporations — Fictitious-name register, read as an alphabetical window

    dos.sunbiz.org · read August 3, 2026

  2. Florida Division of Corporations — Fictitious-name detail record

    dos.sunbiz.org · read August 3, 2026

  3. Florida Division of Corporations — Corporate detail record for the owning company

    search.sunbiz.org · read August 3, 2026

  4. Island Way Pools — Company homepage

    islandwaypools.net · read August 3, 2026

  5. Google — Business profile and reviews, resolved by place ID

    google.com · read August 3, 2026

What this contract costs, and why this number

The pool construction contract is $10,100 for ninety days against Island Way Pools. Half is due on execution and half only if you finish ahead of them. The figure is measured rather than quoted: we survey this market across the AI assistants and the Google local pack, and the number tracks how much of both the strongest firm here already holds. It is an absolute reading rather than a place in a queue, so it does not move when another trade joins the board, and it is not pulled from a rate card.

How the result is measured, in full →Every published price →

Common questions

Why does the pool construction contract name Island Way Pools?
Because the survey measures this market and this is the business it returns. Of the ninety-eight businesses taking a top-three place anywhere on the Clearwater grid, this one is third, and it is the one standing highest in the market on its weaker of the two measured axes — which is the test the board applies, because a target has to be hard to beat on the side where they are softest. Three gates cleared before the name was published, each on a positive reading of a filing rather than on an absence.
If they are strongest on none of the fifteen searches, why are they the target?
Because nobody is strongest on them. The largest showing by any business on any one of the fifteen is six grid points of twenty-five, so there is no leader here to unseat — there is a flat field of ninety-eight, and this firm sits third in it with a position no wording has moved. What the contract is graded on is displacing a named business in the pack, and the board names the one that is hardest to displace on its weaker axis rather than the one with the best single headline. The zero above is honest, and it is not the whole reading.
Why did this page say something different about a different company yesterday?
Because the funded survey retargeted this row on 3 August 2026, and the firm this contract named until then does not appear on the survey's map grid or in its assistant readings at all. The contract is won by beating the named business in the local pack, and a target holding no cell of the grid cannot be beaten on it. Every reading on this page was recomputed or re-read for the business now named; nothing was carried across the rename, and the earlier company's figures are not restated here.

Find out whether your territory is open

One contract per trade in Clearwater. If yours is open you can execute at the published price today; if a competitor already holds it, it is held until their ninety days are up.

See open contractsRequest a territory

The survey is credited in full against the contract if your territory opens and you take it.