Skip to content
Hitman Marketing
Contracts

The board · Senior living

Assisted living in Clearwater: who holds the fifteen searches this contract tracks

The Clearwater assisted living contract names The Oaks of Clearwater as its mark. They return on six of the fifteen searches this board fixes in writing, and what sits above them on most of those is not another building — it is the national referral channel that owns the top of this trade's results.

Senior living — the mark

The Oaks of Clearwater

Clearwater

Six of fifteen searches held, in a trade whose top results belong to a national referral channel.

Open

Every reading on this page came from a public source that anyone can check. Each one names the register or platform it was read from, and the date it was read, in the list at the bottom.

The searches they hold, and where they come back

The contract fixes fifteen searches in writing before any work starts — the ones somebody in Clearwater actually types when they need senior living. This is where The Oaks of Clearwater came back on the ones they hold, and what came back above them. A position reads “5 of 6” because it is a place in the list that search returned, not a rank we can see inside Google.

Where The Oaks of Clearwater returns on the fifteen searches this contract tracks
The searchWhere they came backAbove them
assisted living Clearwater FL5 of 74 directories, none
assisted living community Clearwater FL6 of 95 directories, none
memory care Clearwater FL6 of 93 directories, 2 independent
dementia care Clearwater FL9 of 94 directories, 4 franchise
senior living tour Clearwater FL6 of 95 directories, none
I need memory care in Clearwater today — name specific companies.1 of 6none

6 of the fifteen, read once on August 1, 2026. A single reading on a single day is a snapshot, not a trend, and nothing here claims a position holds tomorrow. Counts of who came back above them cover the domains whose owner we could establish; where we could not, the domain is left out of those counts rather than guessed into one, so they are a floor.

Who they are, on the record

Every line here is a filing the company made itself, read from the state’s own register on August 1, 2026. It is here because a contract names a company, and a company is whatever the register says it is.

Register

The Oaks of Clearwater

State licence
4818
Licence status
LICENSED
Licence term
17 January 2026 to 16 January 2028
Licensed beds
175
Management company on the licence
None recorded — the field is empty
Licensee of record
The Oaks on the Bay, LLC
Florida document number
L13000148838
Entity filed
22 October 2013
Entity status, read from the detail page
ACTIVE
Name history and corporate events
None on the record
Annual reports
Filed in every year from 2014 to 2026, most recently 23 February 2026
Trading-name registrations
Three, all owned by the same company — two running to 31 December 2027, one expired in 2019
Years on the Florida register
12, from the operating company's own filing date

Read from the register’s own detail pages, not from a search result. A found record is not an active record, and a status in a results list is not a status.

Why we are willing to name them

Naming a real company in public is a decision, not a flourish. Three things have to be true before a business appears on this board, and each one is a reading rather than an opinion. A business that fails any of them is not named, and the trade ships without a target — which has happened.

  1. Nobody bigger is paying their bills

    Eleven Florida filings connected to this community were pulled and read to their detail pages. Every authorised person named on every one of them is a natural person, and not one filing names a company as member, manager, officer or director. The state health register's management-company field is empty. That is a filing naming an individual, not a search that came back with nothing.

  2. They are trading today, on the state's own record

    The state health register prints licence 4818 for this community, status LICENSED, effective 17 January 2026 to 16 January 2028, at 175 beds. The licensee's Florida detail record — the detail page, never a results row — reads ACTIVE, with the 2026 annual report filed on 23 February 2026 and an unbroken chain of them running back to 2014.

  3. Every number here was read again before it was published

    The licence record, the entity record, all three registrations of the trading name and the first-capture date were each re-read from the register's own detail pages on the day of the last pass, and each one returned the value published above. Where a reading could not be taken a second time, this page publishes nothing in its place.

The field they sit in

Across the fifteen searches this contract tracks, 129 organic results were logged and 94 of them belong to a national placement service or a listing site rather than to a care community. Of the 45 top-three positions across those searches, 37 are held by directories, and four of the fifteen returned no care community at all.

Who is competingDomains
Directories and lead aggregators17
National franchise brands4
Private-equity-held groups0
Independent local firms5
Seen too rarely to classify14
Distinct domains in total40

Counted across all fifteen searches. A domain seen once or twice is left unclassified rather than counted as independent — not knowing who owns something is not the same as knowing it is local.

What their reviews say, and what they do not

There is no review figure on this page for The Oaks of Clearwater, and that is a statement about what we could read rather than about them. Nothing reproduced, and nothing here would be published even if it had. The map surface served a page built by JavaScript to every automated reader, which is a failed read rather than a finding. One mediated rating was found on a single hostname and it is refused twice over: a value that only one hostname carries has not reproduced, and a rating beside a named eldercare business is a sentence this board does not publish in any wording. Null here means not read. It is not a low number and it is not a zero.

You will not find a Google review count anywhere on this site. Google Maps returns a page built by JavaScript to every automated reader we have, on every one of these businesses, so any Google figure we published would be one we had not actually read. Where a number appears, it names the platform it came from instead.

How long they have been visible

Their website has been archived since May 2003. The page that carries their best positions on the memory-care searches first appears in the archive in October 2024. First captures only — this board publishes when an asset first appeared and nothing at all about when it was last touched, because that second thing is something a business could close in an afternoon.

What we are not claiming

Research turns up things that do not survive a second look, and things that are true but not ours to publish. Both are listed here, because a page that prints only the flattering half of its own evidence is a sales page, and this is supposed to be a record.

Anything about their care, or anything about their regulatory record.
Not inspections, not complaints, not deficiencies, not staffing, and nothing a family member could read as a warning. Seven identity fields were taken from the state health register — licence number, status, the two effective dates, bed capacity, the licensee string and the management-company field — and the rest of that record was not read into this page, summarised, counted or alluded to. An adverse claim about a named eldercare business is the sentence that turns a marketing page into a legal problem, and this board does not need one.
Adverse material that surfaced three times and is described nowhere.
A directory profile, the search box's own suggestion list, and a rating one search engine republishes from another platform each surfaced adverse material about this business during the pass. All three are recorded here as having been surfaced and refused. None is quoted, paraphrased, characterised, counted or scored, and no sentence on this page rests on any of them.
That no review figure exists for this community anywhere.
An earlier draft of this page said so, and it was wrong: one search engine's record does carry a rating republished from another platform, on both of its renders. It is not published here — one hostname is not a reading, and this is an eldercare business — but the absence is not published either. An exhaustive absence is a claim like any other and this one had no evidence behind it.
Forty-nine years in business.
A directory profile records forty-nine years and a 1977 start. Neither is corroborated by any filing: the operating company was registered in 2013 and its record carries no name history and no corporate event, and the 1988 not-for-profit that shares part of its name shares no officer with it and names no successor anyone can read. The one date that profile records which the register does confirm is the 2013 filing, to the day. Twelve is what this board publishes, because twelve is what is filed.
The searches they do not hold.
Six of the fifteen came back. Naming the other nine would hand a content to-do list to a business this contract is sold to outrank, and a to-do list is the one thing this board does not publish about anyone.
That the searches were read twice.
They were read once. Every position published above is a single dated observation, and this page says so rather than describing it as confirmed. A second reading is what the next pass adds.
Anything about who is buying these searches.
The advertising register could not be read at all. The route served a bot challenge to every request that day, including to the control query documented to carry seven advertisers, so a zero taken from it would have been a fact about our fetcher rather than a fact about the market.

Why does the assisted living contract name The Oaks of Clearwater?

The Oaks of Clearwater is the community that returns most consistently on the assisted living searches this contract tracks, and it clears all three of the gates this board runs before naming anyone. Its licensee is a Florida limited liability company that has filed without a gap since 2013.

Three gates run before any business is named here, and each one has to clear on something we read rather than on something we failed to find. The state health register carries an active licence in this community's name. The Florida register carries an active limited liability company as the licensee, filed in 2013, with an unbroken annual-report chain behind it. And every reading published on this page was taken again on the day of the last pass.

The third gate is the one that decides most trades. Fair fight fails on a filed, readable corporate owner — a holding company, a property trust, a private-equity fund. Eleven filings were pulled and read for this row, and every authorised person on every one of them is a human being. Not one of them names a company as its member, manager, officer or director, and the health register's management-company field is empty.

What stands above an assisted living community in Clearwater search results?

National placement and referral marketplaces stand above them, not other buildings. Three of those sites return on nine of the fifteen assisted living searches this contract tracks, and directories hold most of the top positions across the set. Six other in-market communities return alongside this one on the searches it does hold.

This is the structural fact about assisted living search and it is why the trade carries a cautious verdict on this board rather than a confident one. The head of this field is not other communities. It is a placement channel — national referral marketplaces and local placement advisers that own the top of the results and bill per resident moved in.

A single community cannot displace that channel by outranking it, and nothing here suggests otherwise. What this contract buys is position against the other communities in the same results, which is what the table above measures and all it measures. Four of the fifteen searches returned no care community at any position.

Related: Assisted living marketingHow the result is measured

How long has The Oaks of Clearwater been on the Florida register?

Twelve years. The licensee of record is a Florida limited liability company registered in October 2013 whose own detail record carries no name change and no corporate event of any kind. A 1988 not-for-profit shares part of its name, and no filing connects the two entities.

Twelve is a register reading, not a claim about how long anybody has been caring for residents here. The rule this board counts by is the earliest Florida registration in an evidenced chain of entities under common officers, and each link needs a filing that connects them. Here there is no chain to walk at all: the operating company's record shows no name history and no corporate event.

The trading name itself is registered with the state three times, and all three registrations name the same limited liability company as owner. Two of them run to the end of 2027 and the third expired in 2019. Every one of the three carries the same federal identification number as the entity record, which is what makes them the same company rather than three similar ones.

Where each of these came from

Every register and platform read for this page, with the date it was read. Follow any of them and you will land where we landed.

  1. Florida Agency for Health Care Administration — Licensed facility profile

    quality.healthfinder.fl.gov · read August 2, 2026

  2. Florida Division of Corporations — Entity detail record, and the officer index behind it

    search.sunbiz.org · read August 2, 2026

  3. Florida Division of Corporations — Detail record for the 1988 not-for-profit of a similar name

    search.sunbiz.org · read August 2, 2026

  4. Florida Division of Corporations — Fictitious-name register, every row in the window

    dos.sunbiz.org · read August 2, 2026

  5. Florida Division of Corporations — Fictitious-name detail, the registration running to 2027

    dos.sunbiz.org · read August 2, 2026

  6. Florida Division of Corporations — Fictitious-name detail, the registration that expired in 2019

    dos.sunbiz.org · read August 2, 2026

  7. Internet Archive — First-capture index for the domain

    web.archive.org · read August 2, 2026

  8. Internet Archive — First-capture index for the page carrying their best positions

    web.archive.org · read August 2, 2026

What this contract costs, and why this number

The senior living contract is $13,000 for ninety days against The Oaks of Clearwater. Half is due on execution and half only if you finish ahead of them. The figure is computed from four readings — how many of the fifteen searches they hold, how many other firms are ranking alongside them, how long the company has existed, and how consolidated the trade is — and it is scaled against the other twelve trades on the board rather than pulled from a rate card.

How the result is measured, in full →Every published price →

Common questions

Does this board publish anything about a community's care or inspections?
No. Nothing about care, staffing, inspections or any regulator's file on a named eldercare business appears on this site, in any wording. From the state health register we took seven identity fields — licence number, status, effective and expiry dates, bed capacity, the licensee and the management-company field — and read nothing else into this page.
Who owns the assisted living communities competing in Clearwater?
Individuals, on every filing read for this row. The licensee names one manager and that manager is a person rather than a company, and the health register's management-company field is empty. The same person's name sits on sixty-five Florida entities filed over twenty-five years — but those are siblings under a common manager, not subsidiaries, because no filing names a parent.
Why is there no review count for The Oaks of Clearwater on this page?
Because none reproduced, and because of what this trade is. The map surface served a page built by JavaScript to every automated reader we have. One figure was found, republished by one search engine from another platform on a single hostname, and a value only one hostname carries has not reproduced. Beyond that, ratings beside a named eldercare business are not something this board publishes in any wording. A null here means not read. It is not a statement that their reviews are few, and it is not a zero.

Find out whether your territory is open

One contract per trade in Clearwater. If yours is open you can execute at the published price today; if a competitor already holds it, it is held until their ninety days are up.

See open contractsRequest a territory

The survey is credited in full against the contract if your territory opens and you take it.